Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39414670›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2024

Feasibility study of opportunistic osteoporosis screening on chest CT using a multi-feature fusion DCNN model.

Jing Pan, Peng-Cheng Lin, Shen-Chu Gong, Ze Wang, Rui Cao, Yuan Lv, Kun Zhang, Lin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep learning model for osteoporosis screening on chest CT with low tube voltage.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jing PanDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, Jiangsu, China.
Peng-Cheng LinSchool of Electrical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, Jiangsu, China.
Shen-Chu GongDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, Jiangsu, China.
Ze WangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, Jiangsu, China.
Rui CaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, Jiangsu, China.
Yuan LvDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, Jiangsu, China.
Kun ZhangSchool of Electrical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, Jiangsu, China. zhangkun_nt@163.com.
Lin WangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, Jiangsu, China. wanglin_nt@126.com.

Funding

Building a Regional Diagnosis and Treatment Path for Osteoporosis Based on Artificial Intelligence MSZ2022009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multi-feature fusion DCNN model for automated evaluation of lumbar vertebrae L1 on chest combined with clinical information and radiomics permits estimation of volumetric bone mineral density for evaluation of osteoporosis. PURPOSE: To develop a multi-feature deep learning model based on chest CT, combined with clinical information and radiomics to explore the feasibility in screening for osteoporosis based on estimation of volumetric bone mineral density.

methodsThe chest CT images of 1048 health check subjects were retrospectively collected as the master dataset, and the images of 637 subjects obtained from a different CT scanner were used for the external validation cohort. The subjects were divided into three categories according to the quantitative CT (QCT) examination, namely, normal group, osteopenia group, and osteoporosis group. Firstly, a deep learning-based segmentation model was constructed. Then, classification models were established and selected, and then, an optimal model to build bone density value prediction regression model was chosen.

resultsThe DSC value was 0.951 ± 0.030 in the testing dataset and 0.947 ± 0.060 in the external validation cohort. The multi-feature fusion model based on the lumbar 1 vertebra had the best performance in the diagnosis. The area under the curve (AUC) of diagnosing normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis was 0.992, 0.973, and 0.989. The mean absolute errors (MAEs) of the bone density prediction regression model in the test set and external testing dataset are 8.20 mg/cm

conclusionThe multi-feature fusion DCNN model based on only the lumbar 1 vertebrae and clinical variables can perform bone density three-classification diagnosis and estimate volumetric bone mineral density. If confirmed in independent populations, this automated opportunistic chest CT evaluation can help clinical screening of large-sample populations to identify subjects at high risk of osteoporotic fracture.

Indexed as

Bone DensityFeasibility StudiesLumbar VertebraeOsteoporosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedBone Diseases, MetabolicDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiography, ThoracicRetrospective StudiesBone mineral densityDeep learningFeature fusionOsteoporosisQuantitative CT

Identifiers

PMID39414670
PMCPMC11485148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.