ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Follow-up analysis of lesion characteristics of enchondromas and atypical cartilaginous tumours of the knee and shoulder region on MRI.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wait, scan and then? Exploring the long-term natural course of 119 low-grade central cartilaginous lesions of the long bones with MRI follow-up.European radiology · 2026Article
- Machine learning vs. radiomics for discriminating atypical cartilaginous tumors from benign enchondromas on MRI.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Giant cell tumor of the pubic bone with concomitant enchondroma: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Implementation of structured radiology reporting and its associated accuracy in comparison to pancreas multi-disciplinary clinic expert radiology review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEnchondromas (ECs) and atypical cartilaginous tumours (ACTs), respectively, represent benign and intermediate cartilaginous bone tumours. Differentiation between these tumour entities bears difficulties, as histology and MRI cannot always provide exact diagnoses. Observation of the natural course of ECs/ACTs via follow-up MRIs might support tumour distinction without needing biopsy harbouring sampling error. MATERIALS AND
methodsReports of patients that had undergone MRI exams of the knee (n = 44.762) or shoulder (n = 21.550) at a single radiology institute between 01.01.2007 and 01.03.2020 were searched for ECs/ACTs with at least one follow-up MRI. Scans of 176 patients (with 182 cartilage lesions) fulfilling these criteria were subsequently re-examined together with corresponding MRI reports to evaluate morphological tumour development over time, focusing on potential alterations of lesion size, tumour-related oedema, and scalloping.
resultsMedian follow-up time was 27 ± 53 months for knee tumours and 26 ± 32 months for shoulder lesions. Presence of tumour growth was significantly higher in ACTs than in ECs both at the knee (p = 0.04) and shoulder (p = 0.03). While ACTs were associated with median tumour growth rates of 0.039 mm/month (knee) and 0.083 mm/month (shoulder), ECs of the knee and shoulder showed lower median growth rates equivalent to 0.0 mm/month (p < 0.01, p < 0.01). ECs and ACTs both presented stable regarding tumour-related oedema and scalloping during follow-up.
conclusionACTs and ECs show different tumour growth rates. Growth rates are slow for both, ECs and ACTs, supporting the current concept of watchful waiting. ECs may decrease in size. Follow-up MRIs may support the radiological differentiation of cartilage lesions. KEY POINTS: Question Both singular MRI and histological examination have limitations regarding differentiation of enchondromas (EC) and atypical cartilaginous tumours (ACTs). Findings Median ACT growth rates were 0.039 mm/month (knee) and 0.083 mm/month (shoulder), while median growth rates of EC in the knee and shoulder were 0.0 mm/month. Clinical relevance Active surveillance is a safe strategy when dealing with ECs and ACTs of the long bones; follow-up MRIs may support tumour distinction of cartilage lesions, as ECs and ACTs show different growth behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.