Efficacy of Microneedle as an Assisted Therapy for Melasma: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

backgroundMelasma is a common hyperpigmentary disorder, it has variety of treatment options, but it usually has a poor curative effect and high recurrence rate. Microneedles have shown certain prospects in the treatment of melasma as an assisted therapy, but there is no consensus on its efficacy and safety. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of microneedles as an adjuvant treatment for melasma.

methodsStatistical tools were used to adjust the improvement of MASI scores in all studies to obtain standardized mean differences (SMD), and then, meta-analysis were performed. Risk ratio (RR) was utilized to assess adverse reactions, clinical effectiveness, and patient satisfaction.

resultsThe effects of microneedle-assisted treatment for melasma begin to manifest at the 4th week, with optimal results observed at the 24th week, and with a high patient satisfaction. Compared with oral medication alone, microneedle-assisted therapy began to be more effective at week 12 and continued by 24 weeks. Compared with laser therapy alone, microneedle-assisted therapy also showed stronger efficacy, at the 8th week, microneedle-assisted treatment was significantly more effective, reaching its peak at the 12th week. Finally, in the comparison of microneedle and microinjection therapy, microneedle has always been more significant than micro-injection.

conclusionsMicroneedle is a valuable adjunctive therapy for melasma treatment. It enhances long-term clinical outcomes compared to monotherapy and is associated with high patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .