Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39414337›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental emergency medicine2025

Pediatric trauma management in Switzerland: insights from a nationwide survey.

Leopold Simma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Leopold SimmaEmergency Department, University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Anna Mueller Grocholski Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore and analyze pediatric trauma care practices across designated pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) in Switzerland. The focus was on reception, trauma team activation (TTA), trauma team composition, patient volumes, and infrastructure.

methodsA national online survey was conducted among all eight PTCs in Switzerland using an 18-item questionnaire. The survey investigated organizational aspects, criteria for TTA, patient volume, and communication modalities in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs).

resultsAll PTCs responded, revealing varying methods of TTA, with reception of major trauma patients occurring at either PEDs or adjacent adult trauma facilities. Trauma team composition and activation criteria also differ among centers, with nonsurgeons often leading the teams and anesthesiologists being the default facilitators of airway management. TTA criteria vary widely, with the most common being the request of prehospitalization staff (62.5%) and physician discretion (50%). Trauma resuscitation is predominantly led by PED attendants (75%).

conclusionThis survey provides insights into the state of pediatric trauma care in Switzerland. The findings underscore the importance of multidisciplinary teams and variability in trauma management practices, which are often tailored to local circumstances. Despite the study limitations of using self-reported data and the small sample size owing to the country's size, the result suggest that a national trauma registry would be helpful to the evaluation and optimization of pediatric trauma care protocols.

Indexed as

ChildHospital emergency serviceMultiple traumaPatient care teamWounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID39414337
PMCPMC12541523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.