ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2024
Correlation of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in tumour cells between diagnostic small biopsies performed by radial EBUS and surgical specimens of peripheral lung cancer.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of PD-L1 expression between biopsy specimens and surgical resection specimens in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Optimizing diagnostic yield in pulmonary lesions: impact of combined sampling tools and EBUS-TBNA during radial EBUS.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveExpression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in tumour cells (TCs) is predictive of immunotherapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Small biopsy samples collected by bronchoscopy are often used to diagnose peripheral lung cancer. It is questionable whether these small samples from radial endobronchial ultrasonography (r-EBUS) procedures are representative of PD-L1 expression in TCs.
methodsWe retrieved data of consecutive patients who had surgery for NSCLC and previous r-EBUS biopsy sampling, from 2017 to 2019 in our centre. PD-L1 expression in tumour cells was categorised as <1%, 1%-49% and ≥50%. PD-L1 expression was compared between r-EBUS samples and surgical specimens.
resultsAmong 1026 patients who had r-EBUS, 521 had a diagnosis of lung cancer on r-EBUS sample. PD-L1 testing was indicated in 356 cases and results were considered contributive in 325 cases (91%). 82 patients with PD-L1 expression in r-EBUS samples had subsequent surgical resection of the nodule and were included in the study. PD-L1 expression was identical between r-EBUS samples and surgical specimens in 67% of cases, with kappa 0.44 (p<0.001). 82% of patients with PD-L1≥50% in surgical specimens were identified in r-EBUS samples. Nonetheless, 31% of patients with no PD-L1 expression in r-EBUS samples had some expression in surgical specimens.
conclusionSmall samples obtained by r-EBUS are adequate for assessment of PD-L1 expression in tumour cells, with moderate concordance compared to surgical specimens. Reassessment of PD-L1 expression in larger samples may be useful to guide therapy in patients with no PD-L1 expression in r-EBUS samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.