ArticleBMJ open2024
Development of a multifactorial prediction model for commute mode choice in 10 983 Finnish public sector employees: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Employer-provided bicycle benefit and changes in commuting and overall physical activity: A quasi-experiment among Finnish municipal employees.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2026Article
- Beyond person-centered approaches: Integrating individual, sociodemographic and socio-spatial factors to better understand active and sustainable mobility.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2026Article
- Which psychosocial job demands matter most for parasympathetic heart rate variability? A dominance analysis study.Journal of occupational health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study is to examine the feasibility of using survey data to identify factors that predict commute mode choice.
designThe study design is cross-sectional.
settingSurvey data from the Finnish Public Sector study (2020) were used.
participants42 574 public sector employees, of whom 10 983 were selected for the final sample. These included employees with 5 km or less commuting distances and those working full-time onsite or partly remotely. The mean age was 46 (SD 11) years, and 84% were women. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Commute by (1) bike or foot (an active mode) during summer and winter weather and (2) by car (a passive mode) during summer and winter weather.
methodsUsing logistic Lasso (least-absolute-shrinkage-and-selection-operator) regression, we developed and tested a prediction model for short commutes of 5 km or less to identify the characteristics of employees most likely to commute actively during summer and winter weather and passively during summer and winter weather.
resultsAll models had a good predictive ability with a C-index of 0.82, 0.77, 0.72 and 0.71. Cycling and walking during summer weather were predicted by shorter commutes, higher physical activity, lower body mass index (BMI), female sex and higher team psychological safety. Predictors of cycling and walking during winter weather were shorter commute length, higher physical activity, lower BMI and higher age. Commuting by car during summer weather was predicted by longer journey length, higher BMI, lower physical activity, male sex and having children 7-18 years old living at home. Predictors of driving during winter weather were almost identical, but the male sex was replaced by having a spouse.
conclusionsWe identified the correlates of active and passive commute choice in different weather conditions with eight variables. This information can be used to develop and target interventions to promote sustainable and healthy commuting modes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.