ArticleBMJ open2024
Rating of perceived exertion as a tool for managing exercise intensity during pregnancy: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is fetal well-being jeopardised during high-intensity interval training?BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDuring pregnancy, international guidelines recommend ≥150 min of moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity per week, with an intensity perceived as fairly light to somewhat hard on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale (ranging from 6 'no exertion' to 20 'maximal exertion', corresponding to 60% to 80% of maximum heart rate). However, the determination and monitoring of exercise intensity seem to be a particular source of confusion, and the most effective method to monitor exercise intensity remains uncertain. This study aimed to examine existing research on the correlation between the Borg RPE scale and maternal heart rate (MHR) for monitoring exercise intensity during pregnancy.
designScoping review using the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus were searched from 16-17 April 2023, with a subsequent search on 1 November 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included studies investigating the correlation between perceived intensity on the Borg RPE scale (6-20) and MHR during exercise in pregnant individuals and written in English/Scandinavian language. There were no restrictions on publication year or study design. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers screened the articles based on title and abstract. Selected articles were read in full text and reference lists of screened articles were also checked. Out of 120 studies screened, six articles met the inclusion criteria after removing one duplicate. The results were qualitatively summarised to provide an overview of common themes and variations between studies. MMAT and GRADE assessed the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence.
resultsThe six studies involved a total of 260 healthy pregnant individuals (gestational week: from 16 to 38), with various exercise protocols (cycling, walking, running and resistance exercise) and intensities (from light to moderate). Three studies supported the Borg RPE scale to estimate exercise intensity during pregnancy, while three found no correlation between this scale and MHR. The certainty of the evidence was graded as low to moderate, with a potential risk of bias due to small sample sizes, incomplete outcome data and inconsistencies across studies.
conclusionThe mixed results highlight the complexity of monitoring exercise intensity during pregnancy. Using both the Borg RPE scale and MHR might be better than using them separately for monitoring exercise intensity during pregnancy. Due to limited and inconsistent research, more extensive studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.