ArticleBMJ open2024
Comparative effects of behaviour change techniques using eHealth and mHealth in promoting dietary behaviour: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGlobally, it is estimated that dietary habits contribute to 22% of adult deaths and 15% of disability-adjusted life years, highlighting the critical role of dietary behaviour in public health. Despite the known benefits of healthy eating, many individuals find it challenging to change their diet for disease prevention. eHealth and mHealth interventions using behaviour change techniques (BCTs) have emerged as promising strategies to address this issue. However, the specific BCTs that are most effective in promoting dietary behaviour are not well established. This systematic review and component network meta-analysis (CNMA) aims to estimate the effect size of each BCT on fostering healthy eating. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include randomised controlled trials that assess the effects of eHealth and mHealth interventions on promoting changes in dietary behaviours among healthy adults. Studies with a minimum follow-up period of 3 weeks will be considered. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE [PubMed], Embase [Dialogue], Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycInfo [Dialogue], ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry on 27 January 2024. Two independent reviewers will conduct title and abstract screening followed by a full-text review. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. The primary outcome is dietary behaviour, as measured by changes in the diet quality score and the intake of a specific food. Our data synthesis will apply a frequentist random-effects model for pairwise meta-analysis, network meta-analysis and an additive CNMA model to compute the effect size of each BCT. This methodological approach will reveal the positive and negative effects of each BCT and provide a ranking of these techniques, considering both direct and indirect evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review because it uses existing published data. These results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The current protocol was submitted to PROSPERO on 16 January 2024 (CRD 42024502217).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.