Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39414274›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Advancing health equity and the role of digital health technologies: a scoping review protocol.

Laura Bitomsky, Estelle Celine Pfitzer, Marcia Nißen, Tobias Kowatsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Advancing equity and value in United States healthcare: an umbrella review.International journal for equity in health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Equity by design principles for digital health interventions.International journal for equity in health · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura BitomskySchool of Medicine, University of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0002-9545-0268
Estelle Celine PfitzerSchool of Medicine, University of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0006-0577-2757
Marcia NißenSchool of Medicine, University of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6082-8825
Tobias KowatschSchool of Medicine, University of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland tobias.kowatsch@unisg.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-5939-4145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealthcare systems around the world exhibit inherent systemic inequities that disproportionately impact marginalised populations. Digital health technologies (DHTs) hold promising potential to address these inequities and to play a pivotal role in advancing health equity. However, there is a notable gap regarding a comprehensive and structured overview of existing frameworks and guidelines on advancing health equity and a clear understanding of the potential of DHTs in their implementation. To this end, our primary objectives are first to identify prevalent frameworks and guidelines that promote health equity and second to pinpoint the contemporary role of DHTs as an avenue for implementing these frameworks and guidelines. This synthesis will guide future DHTs, ensuring equitable accessibility and effectiveness and ultimately contributing to enhancing health equity among marginalised populations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This work adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Reviews. To identify pertinent evidence, we will employ seven electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and WISO) encompassing the fields of medicine, healthcare and social sciences. Moreover, selected grey literature will be considered. We will include primary and secondary studies published in English between 2010 and 2023 that focus on (technology and non-technology-based) frameworks and guidelines for health equity improvement. Each article will undergo an independent assessment for eligibility, followed by the extraction of pertinent data from eligible sources. Subsequently, the extracted data will be subjected to qualitative and quantitative analyses, and findings will be presented using narrative and descriptive formats. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is deemed unnecessary for this scoping review, as it involves synthesising existing knowledge. The findings from this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/94pht.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyHealth EquityBiomedical TechnologyDigital HealthHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topicdigital technologyhealth equityhealth informaticshealth policyInformation managementinformation technology

Identifiers

PMID39414274
PMCPMC11481109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.