ReviewBMJ military health2025
Biomechanical and physiological biomarkers are useful indicators of military personnel readiness: a multi-institutional, multinational research collaboration.
Review in BMJ military health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Enhancing resilience in military personnel: insights into physiological, physical, psychological dimensions.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A ubiquitous problem facing military organisations is musculoskeletal injury (MSKI) risk identification. Recently, two research groups, each with their own funding, collaborated to address this problem. Combining their respective areas of expertise in biomechanics and physiological biomarkers, the group explored this problem in the laboratory and in the field. They have developed a machine learning model in a US Marine Corps (USMC) officer cadet cohort that identifies MSKI risk from a single jump test, identified a minimum inertial measurement unit sensor array to quantity jump and squat performance and have identified sex differences in overuse, lower-limb injury risk. This machine learning model was able to correctly predict lift to place within 4 kg using a testing data set and less than 1 kg in the training set of data. Such collaborative approaches are encouraged to address complicated research problems. To assemble an effective team, consider forming groups that best complement each other's areas of expertise and prioritise securing separate funding to ensure each group can act independently. By doing this, the group has assessed the suitability and feasibility of various wearable technologies, used machine learning to gain insights into USMC physiological training adaptations, and developed an understanding of MSKI risk profiles within this cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.