ArticleJournal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association2024
National assessment of clinicians participating in stroke treatment decisions at strokenet regional coordinating centers: Clinicians Making Stroke Treatment Decisions.
Article in Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSince the introduction of thrombolytics, stroke teams evolved to improve thrombolytic care delivery. The impact of the advent of endovascular therapy on the composition of acute stroke teams is unknown. MATERIALS AND
methodsA two-part pilot-tested survey was deployed to site-Principal Investigators (PIs) of the 27 StrokeNet Regional Coordinating Centers (RCCs) regarding institutional acute stroke teams. Part A inquired about the participation of personnel in each type of stroke response. Part B identified stroke team physicians and the types of responses in which they participate to assess training background of stroke team members.
resultsResponse rates for Part A and B were 66% and 48%, respectively. In Part A, 67% (12/18) of sites reported trainees always responded to ED stroke activations with significant autonomy. 44% (7/16) and 27% (4/15) of sites reported NP and PA response to ED stroke alerts, respectively, but with limited autonomy. In Part B, 124 physicians involved in ED stroke alerts were identified, the large majority of whom (79%, 95% CI: 71-85) were vascular neurology trained. The 39 (23%) stroke team members involved in endovascular therapy had the following training: 49% (34-64) neurosurgery, 28% (17-44) radiology, 18% (9-33) vascular neurology 5% (1-16) neurology.
conclusionsWe identified modest heterogeneity in the composition of acute stroke team members across StrokeNet RCCs. Individuals performing endovascular therapy had a variety of clinical specializations, reflecting the evolving multidisciplinary nature of interventional acute stroke care. At StrokeNet RCCs, teams have significant trainee involvement in both ED and inpatient acute stroke responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.