ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Reconstructing tumor clonal heterogeneity and evolutionary relationships based on tumor DNA sequencing data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fundamentals and emerging frontiers in p53-targeted drug development.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Review
- Integrative Sequencing and Proteogenomic Approaches to Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Cholangiocarcinoma: Implications for Precision Diagnosis and Therapy.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Whole‑exome evolutionary profiling of osteosarcoma uncovers metastasis‑related driver mutations and generates an independently validated predictive classifier.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Computational strategies in tumor phylogenetics: evaluating multimodal integration and methodological trade-offs across study designs.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The heterogeneity of tumor clones drives the selection and evolution of distinct tumor cell populations, resulting in an intricate and dynamic tumor evolution process. While tumor bulk DNA sequencing helps elucidate intratumor heterogeneity, challenges such as the misidentification of mutation multiplicity due to copy number variations and uncertainties in the reconstruction process hinder the accurate inference of tumor evolution. In this study, we introduce a novel approach, REconstructing Tumor Clonal Heterogeneity and Evolutionary Relationships (RETCHER), which characterizes more realistic cancer cell fractions by accurately identifying mutation multiplicity while considering uncertainty during the reconstruction process and the credibility and reasonableness of subclone clustering. This method comprehensively and accurately infers multiple forms of tumor clonal heterogeneity and phylogenetic relationships. RETCHER outperforms existing methods on simulated data and infers clearer subclone structures and evolutionary relationships in real multisample sequencing data from five tumor types. By precisely analysing the complex clonal heterogeneity within tumors, RETCHER provides a new approach to tumor evolution research and offers scientific evidence for developing precise and personalized treatment strategies. This approach is expected to play a significant role in tumor evolution research, clinical diagnosis, and treatment. RETCHER is available for free at https://github.com/zlsys3/RETCHER.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.