ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024
Hemolytic reaction after major and minor compatible blood transfusion for a cesarean section patient in a resource-limited area: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA hemolytic transfusion reaction is the destruction of red blood cells caused by immunological incompatibility between the donor and the recipient, not only incompatibility but also, rarely, compatible blood transfusion, which may cause a hemolytic transfusion reaction. A hemolytic transfusion reaction occurs when the transfusion causes symptoms as well as clinical or laboratory indicators of increased red cell death. PATIENT PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 27-year-old Gravida II Para I mother who was blood group AB positive with anaemia, hypotension secondary to antepartum hemorrhage, and a mentally conscious mother who was transferred to our obstetric emergency operation theatre. As she experienced bleeding on arrival, we assessed the patient's history and performed anaesthesia-related physical examinations, such as cardiovascular examination, respiratory examination, central nerve system examination, and airway examination. We followed the patient postoperatively until discharge from the hospital, and 12.9 g/dl hemoglobin, 36.3 % haematocrit, 402 × 10 CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Acute hemolytic transfusion is a medical emergency with an estimated frequency of one per 70,000 blood product transfusions and an estimated fatality rate of five per 10 million RBC unit transfusions. Importantly, the traditional triad of fever, flank pain, and red or dark urine is uncommon. However, these symptoms may not be immediately visible if the patient is under anaesthesia; in such circumstances, seeping from venipuncture and dark urine caused by DIC and hemoglobinuria, respectively, may be the only observations.
conclusionBlood transfusion is performed in 0.5-3 % of women with obstetric hemorrhage and accounts for 1 % of all transfused blood products in high-income countries. Anesthesiologists face a significant issue in identifying the necessity for transfusion in patients with obstetric hemorrhage. Hemolytic reactions after blood transfusion are common during emergency patient management. For this reason, the World Health Organization has developed guidelines for early detection and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.