Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39413371›Full record

ArticleJMIR dermatology2024

AI in Psoriatic Disease: Scoping Review.

Richard Barlow, Anthony Bewley, Maria Angeliki Gkini

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard BarlowDermatology Department, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8667-3529
Anthony BewleyDepartment of Dermatology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1195-0290
Maria Angeliki GkiniDepartment of Dermatology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0070-1945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has many applications in numerous medical fields, including dermatology. Although the majority of AI studies in dermatology focus on skin cancer, there is growing interest in the applicability of AI models in inflammatory diseases, such as psoriasis. Psoriatic disease is a chronic, inflammatory, immune-mediated systemic condition with multiple comorbidities and a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Advanced treatments, including biologics and small molecules, have transformed the management of psoriatic disease. Nevertheless, there are still considerable unmet needs. Globally, delays in the diagnosis of the disease and its severity are common due to poor access to health care systems. Moreover, despite the abundance of treatments, we are unable to predict which is the right medication for the right patient, especially in resource-limited settings. AI could be an additional tool to address those needs. In this way, we can improve rates of diagnosis, accurately assess severity, and predict outcomes of treatment.

objectiveThis study aims to provide an up-to-date literature review on the use of AI in psoriatic disease, including diagnostics and clinical management as well as addressing the limitations in applicability.

methodsWe searched the databases MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase using the keywords "AI AND psoriasis OR psoriatic arthritis OR psoriatic disease," "machine learning AND psoriasis OR psoriatic arthritis OR psoriatic disease," and "prognostic model AND psoriasis OR psoriatic arthritis OR psoriatic disease" until June 1, 2023. Reference lists of relevant papers were also cross-examined for other papers not detected in the initial search.

resultsOur literature search yielded 38 relevant papers. AI has been identified as a key component in digital health technologies. Within this field, there is the potential to apply specific techniques such as machine learning and deep learning to address several aspects of managing psoriatic disease. This includes diagnosis, particularly useful for remote teledermatology via photographs taken by patients as well as monitoring and estimating severity. Similarly, AI can be used to synthesize the vast data sets already in place through patient registries which can help identify appropriate biologic treatments for future cohorts and those individuals most likely to develop complications.

conclusionsThere are multiple advantageous uses for AI and digital health technologies in psoriatic disease. With wider implementation of AI, we need to be mindful of potential limitations, such as validation and standardization or generalizability of results in specific populations, such as patients with darker skin phototypes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePsoriasisArthritis, PsoriaticHumansMachine LearningQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness Indexartificial intelligencebiologicsmachine learningmobile phoneprognostic modelspsoriasispsoriatic arthritispsoriatic disease

Identifiers

PMID39413371
PMCPMC11525079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.