ArticleScience advances2024
Remote sensing and computer vision for marine aquaculture.
Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Aquaculture, Processing, Safety, and Traceability in the Industry of Aquatic Products: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multi-interface electrical double layers dynamics as a unified platform for power generation and environmental intelligence.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Tilapia Feeding Behavior Image Dataset: A Benchmark Resource for Automated Feeding Intensity Recognition in Aquaculture.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Article
- Transparency in aquaculture subsidy reporting urgently needed.Science advances · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aquaculture, the cultivation of aquatic plants and animals, has grown rapidly since the 1990s, but sparse, self-reported, and aggregated production data limit the effective understanding and monitoring of the industry's trends and potential risks. Building on a manual survey of aquaculture production from remote sensing imagery, we train a computer vision model to identify marine aquaculture cages from aerial and satellite imagery and generate a spatially explicit dataset of finfish production locations in the French Mediterranean from 2000 to 2021 including 4010 cages (average cage area, 69 square meters). We demonstrate the value of our method as an easily adaptable, cost-effective approach that can improve the speed and reliability of aquaculture surveys and enables downstream analyses relevant to researchers and regulators. We illustrate its use to compute independent estimates of production and develop a flexible framework to quantify uncertainty in these estimates. Overall, our study presents an efficient, scalable, and adaptable method for monitoring aquaculture production from remote sensing imagery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.