Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39413078›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Environmental DNA as a complementary tool for biodiversity monitoring: A multi-technique and multi-trophic approach to investigate cetacean distribution and feeding ecology.

Luís Afonso, Joana Costa, Ana Mafalda Correia, Raul Valente, Eva Lopes, Maria Paola Tomasino, Ágatha Gil, Cláudia Oliveira-Rodrigues, Isabel Sousa Pino, Alfredo López and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Luís AfonsoCIIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3978-1388
Joana CostaCIIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4023-7681
Ana Mafalda CorreiaCIIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Raul ValenteCIIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Eva LopesCIIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Maria Paola TomasinoCIIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Ágatha GilCIIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Cláudia Oliveira-RodriguesCIIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Isabel Sousa PinoCIIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Alfredo LópezDepartment of Biology, UA-University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.
Paula Suarez-BreguaIEO-CSIC-Spanish Institute of Oceanography of the Spanish National Research Council, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5303-1447
Catarina MagalhãesCIIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) to assess the presence of biological communities has emerged as a promising monitoring tool in the marine conservation landscape. Moreover, advances in Next-Generation Sequencing techniques, such as DNA metabarcoding, enable multi-species detection in mixed samples, allowing the study of complex ecosystems such as oceanic ones. We aimed at using these molecular-based techniques to characterize cetacean communities, as well as potential prey on the northern coast of Mainland Portugal. During four seasonal campaigns (summer 2021 to winter 2022/2023), seawater samples were collected along with visual records of cetacean occurrence. The eDNA isolated from 64 environmental samples was sequenced in an Illumina platform, with universal primers targeting marine vertebrates. Five cetacean species were identified by molecular detection: common dolphin (Delphinus delphis), bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), Risso's dolphin (Grampus griseus), harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus). Overall, except for the latter (not sighted during the campaigns), this cetacean community composition was similar to that obtained through visual monitoring, and the complementary results suggest their presence in the region all year round. In addition, the positive molecular detections of Balaenoptera physalus are of special relevance since there are no records of this species reported on scientific bibliography in the area. The detection of multiple known prey of the identified dolphins indicates an overlap between predator and prey in the study area, which suggests that these animals may use this coastal area for feeding purposes. While this methodological approach remains in a development stage, the present work highlights the benefits of using eDNA to study marine communities, with specific applications for research on cetacean distribution and feeding ecology.

Indexed as

BiodiversityCetaceaDNA, EnvironmentalAnimalsDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringFeeding BehaviorHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPortugalSeasonsDNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID39413078
PMCPMC11482729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.