ArticlePloS one2024
Development of a toolkit to help parents/caregivers manage feeding problems in autistic children: A protocol for a realist synthesis and toolkit co-design.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many autistic children have feeding problems, typically eating a limited range of foods. Feeding problems affect quality of life, health, and development. Research suggests that parents are often unsure when to or whether to seek help. When they do, local provision of help across the UK is often lacking. A toolkit could offer a tailored, accessible, and scalable early intervention to support parents. We aim to develop the blueprint of a toolkit to help parents/caregivers manage feeding problems in their autistic children. Medical Research Council guidance on developing complex interventions informs three successive work packages: Realist review: a literature search and analysis using realist theory of logic to construct programme theory(s) in line with RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) guidance.Realist evaluation: interviews of three groups: autistic children, young people and adults (experts), parents/caregivers of autistic children (parents), and professionals who help parents manage feeding problems (professionals) across the UK. Analysis of verbatim interview transcripts using realist theory of logic to refine programme theory(s).Co-design of the toolkit blueprint: behaviour change theory applied to the programme theory(s) will generate candidate components for the online tool. A blueprint (a detailed textual outline) will be co-designed. A participatory research team of experts, parents, and professionals will be involved in each work package. Where consensus is needed it will be reached by asynchronous nominal group technique. A PPI (public and patient involvement) advisory group of experts and parents will ensure the project is relevant, respectful, and accessible. Findings of each step will be disseminated via journal publications, conferences, social media, as well as PPI-co-produced webinars and a dissemination event. On completion, this project will provide the foundation for the subsequent development and refinement of the prototype toolkit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.