Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39413064›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Machine learning algorithms to predict treatment success for patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.

Shaik Ahamed Fayaz, Lakshmanan Babu, Loganathan Paridayal, Mahalingam Vasantha, Palaniyandi Paramasivam, Karuppasamy Sundarakumar, Chinnaiyan Ponnuraja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shaik Ahamed FayazDepartment of Statistics, ICMR - National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6650-3028
Lakshmanan BabuCognizant Technology Solutions, Chennai, India.
Loganathan ParidayalDepartment of Statistics, Madras Christian College, Chennai, India.
Mahalingam VasanthaDepartment of Statistics, ICMR - National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Palaniyandi ParamasivamDepartment of Statistics, ICMR - National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.
Karuppasamy SundarakumarDepartment of Statistics, ICMR - National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.ORCID 0009-0003-1309-0439
Chinnaiyan PonnurajaDepartment of Statistics, ICMR - National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1762-6424

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advancements in detection and treatment, tuberculosis (TB), an infectious illness caused by the Mycobacterium TB bacteria, continues to pose a serious threat to world health. The TB diagnosis phase includes a patient's medical history, physical examination, chest X-rays, and laboratory procedures, such as molecular testing and sputum culture. In artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) is an advanced study of statistical algorithms that can learn from historical data and generalize the results to unseen data. There are not many studies done on the ML algorithm that enables the prediction of treatment success for patients with pulmonary TB (PTB). The objective of this study is to identify an effective and predictive ML algorithm to evaluate the detection of treatment success in PTB patients and to compare the predictive performance of the ML models. In this retrospective study, a total of 1236 PTB patients who were given treatment under a randomized controlled clinical trial at the ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India were considered for data analysis. The multiple ML models were developed and tested to identify the best algorithm to predict the sputum culture conversion of TB patients during the treatment period. In this study, decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and naïve bayes (NB) models were validated with high performance by achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) greater than 80%. The salient finding of the study is that the DT model was produced as a better algorithm with the highest accuracy (92.72%), an AUC (0.909), precision (95.90%), recall (95.60%) and F1-score (95.75%) among the ML models. This methodology may be used to study the precise ML model classification for predicting the treatment success of TB patients during the treatment period.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningTuberculosis, PulmonaryAdultAntitubercular AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisRetrospective StudiesSputumSupport Vector MachineTreatment OutcomeAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID39413064
PMCPMC11482692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.