ArticlePloS one2024
Machine learning algorithms to predict treatment success for patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced statistical approaches in tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment outcomes in Africa: a systematic review.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Review
- Scaling trachoma surveillance in endemic areas using machine learning.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of tuberculosis mortality: a comparative analysis of random survival forest and cox regression models.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota and tuberculosis.iMeta · 2025Review
- Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Predicting Late Leprosy Diagnosis by Physical Disability Grade in Brazil (2018-2022).Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- An enhancing diagnostic pulmonary diseases diagnostic method for differentiating talaromycosis from tuberculosis.iScience · 2025Article
- Predicting and improving diagnosis of tuberculosis outcomes in South Africa using machine learning techniques.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advancements in detection and treatment, tuberculosis (TB), an infectious illness caused by the Mycobacterium TB bacteria, continues to pose a serious threat to world health. The TB diagnosis phase includes a patient's medical history, physical examination, chest X-rays, and laboratory procedures, such as molecular testing and sputum culture. In artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) is an advanced study of statistical algorithms that can learn from historical data and generalize the results to unseen data. There are not many studies done on the ML algorithm that enables the prediction of treatment success for patients with pulmonary TB (PTB). The objective of this study is to identify an effective and predictive ML algorithm to evaluate the detection of treatment success in PTB patients and to compare the predictive performance of the ML models. In this retrospective study, a total of 1236 PTB patients who were given treatment under a randomized controlled clinical trial at the ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India were considered for data analysis. The multiple ML models were developed and tested to identify the best algorithm to predict the sputum culture conversion of TB patients during the treatment period. In this study, decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and naïve bayes (NB) models were validated with high performance by achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) greater than 80%. The salient finding of the study is that the DT model was produced as a better algorithm with the highest accuracy (92.72%), an AUC (0.909), precision (95.90%), recall (95.60%) and F1-score (95.75%) among the ML models. This methodology may be used to study the precise ML model classification for predicting the treatment success of TB patients during the treatment period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.