Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39413050›Full record

Trial reportBJS open2024

Effect of peritoneal and wound lavage with super-oxidized solution on surgical-site infection after open appendicectomy in perforated appendicitis (PLaSSo): randomized clinical trial.

Harivinthan Sellappan, Dinesh Alagoo, Christina Loo, Kaesarina Vijian, Rohamini Sibin, Jitt Aun Chuah

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04512196 (Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Perforated Appendicitis After Peritoneal Lavage With Super-oxidised Solution), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04512196 nacompletednot on this map

Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Perforated Appendicitis After Peritoneal Lavage With Super-oxidised Solution: A Randomised Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Queen Elizabeth, MalaysiaRan2020 to 2022Enrolled102ConditionsPerforated AppendicitisArmsSuperoxidized Water, Normal Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Harivinthan SellappanDepartment of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-1459-2831
Dinesh AlagooDepartment of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
Christina LooDepartment of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
Kaesarina VijianDepartment of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
Rohamini SibinDepartment of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
Jitt Aun ChuahDepartment of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.

Funding

MOH Research Grant, Ministry of Health Malaysia NMRR-16-2905-30891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical-site infection following open appendicectomy for perforated appendicitis increases length of hospital stay and treatment costs while compromising patients' quality of life. Data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of super-oxidized solution in perforated appendicitis are lacking. The study objective was to determine the effect of peritoneal and wound lavage with super-oxidized solution in reducing risk of surgical-site infection following open appendicectomy for perforated appendicitis.

methodsIn this multicentre RCT conducted between September 2020 and March 2022, patients aged 13 years and older with perforated appendicitis undergoing open appendicectomy were randomly assigned to receive peritoneal and wound lavage with either super-oxidized solution or normal saline. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection within 30 days after surgery. Randomization was computer-generated, with allocation concealment by opaque, sequentially numbered, sealed envelope. The patients, surgeons, outcome assessors and statisticians performing the analysis were blinded to treatment assigned.

resultsA total of 102 consecutive patients (51 in the super-oxidized solution group and 51 in the normal saline group) were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The super-oxidized solution group showed a significant reduction in overall surgical-site infection (8 (15.6%) versus 19 (37.2%); relative risk (RR) 0.42; 95% c.i. 0.20 to 0.87; P = 0.014), and superficial surgical-site infection (5 (9.8%) versus 18 (35.3%); RR 0.28; 95% c.i. 0.11 to 0.69; P = 0.002), with a number-needed-to-treat of four patients. There were no adverse events in either group.

conclusionsPeritoneal and wound lavage with super-oxidized solution is superior to normal saline in preventing surgical-site infection after open appendicectomy for perforated appendicitis.

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT04512196.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisPeritoneal LavageSurgical Wound InfectionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTherapeutic Irrigation

Identifiers

PMID39413050
PMCPMC11482247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.