Observational studyJAMA network open2024
Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Congenital Heart Disease in the Congenital Heart Initiative Registry.
Observational study in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Emotion Regulation Interventions for Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Characteristics of children with congenital heart defects and their caregivers in three U.S. sites: the Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes Needs and well-beinG of KIDS (CHSTRONG KIDS).Progress in pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents and Young Adults with Congenital Heart Disease and Its Predictors, Including Subjective Transition Readiness to Adulthood.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Social Media Perspectives on Congenital Heart Disease: Integrating Thematic and Sentiment Analysis to Characterize the Digital Health Footprint.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Promoting Advancements in Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology Amid Clinical Trial Challenges.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- From Insight to Action: A National Patient-Centered Strategic Framework for Improving Reproductive Health Outcomes in Individuals With Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- The CHI-RON Study: Using PCORnet® and Patient Engagement Strategies to Improve Diversity Among Research Participants in the Congenital Heart Initiative.Medical care · 2026Article
- Prioritizing patient-centered research in adult congenital heart disease and pregnancy: Findings from Phase 3 of a multiphase national initiative.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- How Emotion Regulation and Illness Identity Shape Mental Health in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Association Between Congenital Heart Disease Complexity, Mental Health Conditions and Opioid Use Disorder.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- A detailed profiling study from the national Australian Congenital Heart Disease registry: rationale and design.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025Article
- Exploring the causal association between congenital heart disease and stroke based on two-sample Mendelian randomization.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: In the US, there are more than 1.5 million adults living with congenital heart disease (CHD). The Congenital Heart Initiative (CHI) is a digital, online, patient-empowered registry that was created to advance multicenter research and improve clinical care by gathering patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in adults with CHD. Objective: To report the initial findings of the PROs for adults with CHD from the first 3 years of the CHI. Design, Setting, and Participants: The CHI was launched nationally on December 7, 2020, as an observational cohort (survey) study. Data were collected virtually through December 31, 2023, and stored on Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant cloud-based servers with restricted access. Adults with CHD were recruited through email, social media, general advertising through advocacy organizations, and targeted outreach (telephone and in-clinic recruitment) by clinical centers. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographics and validated survey tools on quality of life, mental health, physical activity, and health care utilization were collected at baseline and every 4 months. Descriptive statistics were used to understand the associations between various factors, including the complexity of heart defects, physical activity levels, mental health comorbidities, and socioeconomic and health care access variables. All categorical variables were analyzed using χ2 or Fischer exact test as appropriate. Results: By December 31, 2023, the CHI had enrolled 4558 participants (2530 female [56%]) with a mean (SD) age of 38.5 (13.9) years, representing all 50 states. Approximately 88% of participants (3998 participants) completed at least 1 electronic visit as of December 31, 2023. The most prevalent CHD anatomy included tetralogy of Fallot (883 participants [22%]), transposition of great arteries (452 participants [11%]), and coarctation of the aorta (429 participants [11%]). Approximately 88% of participants (3998 participants) reported at least 1 comorbidity, with arrhythmia (1300 participants [33%]) as the most common cardiac comorbidity and mood disorder (1326 participants [35%]) as the most common noncardiac comorbidity. Among female participants, 45% (1147 participants) reported having had a pregnancy, with 38% (967 participants) resulting in biological children. Participants with complex CHD were less likely than those with moderate CHD to meet recommended physical activity guidelines (χ22 = 15.9; n = 3320; P < .001), a factor that was more pronounced among female participants. Overall health-related quality of life was rated as good or better by 84% of participants who completed the quality of life PROs (2882 participants), with no difference by CHD complexity. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of adults living with CHD, many patients reported mood disorders, but most reported good health-related quality of life. The CHI, the largest registry of adults with CHD, is poised to facilitate multicenter research with the goal of improving clinical outcomes for all adults with CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.