ArticleJAMA network open2024
Emergency Care Use During Pregnancy and Severe Maternal Morbidity.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sexually Transmitted Infection Treatment Rates Among Pregnant vs Nonpregnant Patients in Emergency Departments.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Factors influencing pregnant women's use of antenatal and emergency care services covered by social security: findings from the maternal eCohort in Mexico.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Observational
- Increase in 9-1-1 activations for obstetric-related emergencies following the Dobbs decision in the United States.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Comorbidities and Pregnancy-Related Risk Factors in Patients with Severe Maternal Morbidity: Application of a Validated Obstetrical Comorbidity Scoring System to a Surveillance-Identified Population.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Emergency departments are part of the maternal health solution: Findings from piloting an educational toolkit in Illinois.AEM education and training · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Pregnant individuals who repeatedly use emergency care during pregnancy represent a population who could be disproportionately vulnerable to harm, including severe maternal morbidity (SMM). Objective: To explore patterns of unscheduled care visits during pregnancy and ascertain its association with SMM at the time of birth. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from a statewide database that linked hospital records to births and fetal deaths occurring between October 1, 2002, and March 31, 2020, in Massachusetts. Pregnant individuals experiencing births or fetal deaths during the study period were included. Data analysis was conducted from June 2022 to September 2024. Exposure: The exposure was 4 or more cases of emergency use, defined as either an emergency department visit or observational stay during pregnancy not resulting in hospital admission. Pregnancy episode was ascertained by subtracting the gestational age at birth from the date of birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome of interest was the odds ratio (OR) for SMM at the time of birth. The algorithm includes 20 conditions or procedures (excluding transfusion) identified through International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes across the study period. Results: A total of 774 092 pregnant individuals (mean [SD] age, 31.2 [5.8] years; 16.8% Hispanic, 9.3% non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander, 9.5% non-Hispanic Black, 63.1% non-Hispanic White) with emergency care visits during the pregnancy were included; 31.3% of these individuals had at least 1 visit. Overall, 18.1% had 1 visit and 3.3% had 4 or more visits. Four or more unscheduled visits were common among those younger than age 25 years (8.7%), with Hispanic (5.7%) or non-Hispanic Black (4.9%) race and ethnicity, with public insurance (6.5%), or with a comorbidity (19.0%) or an opioid use-related hospitalization (26.8%) in the year prior to pregnancy. Of those with 4 or more unscheduled visits, 43.8% visited more than 1 hospital during pregnancy. In a multivariable analysis of the likelihood of SMM, those with 4 or more unscheduled visits had an adjusted OR of 1.46 (95% CI, 1.29-1.66) compared with those with 0 visits. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that high emergency care use during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk for SMM. With a significant proportion of those with frequent unscheduled visits also using multiple hospitals, solutions that are community-based and integrated across health systems may be most beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.