Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39412670›Full record

SynthesisEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2025

Scrolling through adolescence: a systematic review of the impact of TikTok on adolescent mental health.

Giulia Conte, Giorgia Di Iorio, Dario Esposito, Sara Romano, Fabiola Panvino, Susanna Maggi, Benedetta Altomonte, Maria Pia Casini, Mauro Ferrara, Arianna Terrinoni

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giulia Conte *Department of Human Neuroscience, Unit of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Sabelli 108, 00185, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3497-0414
Giorgia Di Iorio *Department of Human Neuroscience, Unit of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Sabelli 108, 00185, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7938-9611
Dario EspositoDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Unit of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Sabelli 108, 00185, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5994-9788
Sara RomanoDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Unit of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Sabelli 108, 00185, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0531-251X
Fabiola PanvinoDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Unit of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Sabelli 108, 00185, Rome, Italy. fabiola.panvino@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2683-0052
Susanna MaggiDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Unit of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Sabelli 108, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Benedetta AltomonteDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Unit of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Sabelli 108, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Maria Pia CasiniDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Unit of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Sabelli 108, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Mauro FerraraDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Unit of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Sabelli 108, 00185, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1567-4281
Arianna TerrinoniDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Unit of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Sabelli 108, 00185, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7894-4659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amidst rising concerns about mental health in adolescents, the role of social media (SM), particularly highly visual platforms such as TikTok, has become a growing focus of investigation. In the extant literature, conclusive evidence is limited by the aggregate analysis of very heterogeneous SM platforms. This systematic scoping review examines the relationship between TikTok and mental health in adolescents. Additionally, it aims to highlight potential interactions between typical developmental processes and the unique aspects of TikTok, exploring their relevance to mental health within this demographic. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, and PsychINFO yielded 20 studies that met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 17,336 subjects from 10 countries. The retrieved studies analyzed four main topics related to TikTok use, i.e., the overall impact on adolescents' mental health, risk of problematic use and behavioral addiction, consequences on body image and self-esteem, and possible spreading of mental illness behaviors. While TikTok offers creative opportunities for self-expression and peer connection, the literature raises concerns about its potential negative effects on teens, such as lower life satisfaction, increased risk of "contagion" of certain psychiatric symptoms, and problematic usage patterns. Significant variations in study methodologies and outcome measures were observed. In the current era of evolving SM landscapes, a comprehensive approach informed by developmentally grounded research is critically needed to further understand the interplay between SM and adolescent mental health, providing insights for health authorities and policymakers.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorMental DisordersMental HealthSocial MediaAdolescentHumansSelf ConceptAdolescentsBody imageMental healthProblematic social media useSocial mediaTikTok

Identifiers

PMID39412670
PMCPMC12122552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.