Trial reportArchives of dermatological research2024
Impact of medical adhesives on persistent fluid extravasation at needle injection sites in patients with severe edema: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the efficacy of medical glue in halting fluid extravasation at needle insertion sites in patients with severe edema.
methodsSixty patients with severe edema were recruited between June 2022 and June 2023 and randomly allocated into either the control group or the experimental group, with 30 cases in each. In the experimental group, after intramuscular injection, medical glue was administered at the needle insertion site, and covered with gauze dressing upon curing, and subsequently subjected to pressure bandaging. Patients were instructed to limit their activity. Meanwhile, the control group received conventional nursing procedures involving pressure bandaging and activity restriction. The effectiveness of nursing interventions in halting exudation, duration of hospitalization, duration of exudation, nursing expenses, skin complications (infection, rash, abrasion, abnormal sensation, etc.), and patient satisfaction with nursing care were monitored.
resultsComparison between the two groups revealed statistically significant differences in several aspects: the success rate of halting exudation, duration of exudation, total skin complication rate, and overall satisfaction [83.3% vs. 20.0%, (2.20 ± 2.76) days vs. (7.33 ± 3.28) days, 6.67% vs. 33.33%, 80.00% vs. 36.67%, P < 0.05]. However, there were no statistically significant differences in hospitalization time and nursing expenses [(14.50 ± 5.17) days vs. (14.00 ± 3.95) days, (537.53 ± 264.19) yuan vs. (661.97 ± 305.55) yuan, P > 0.05].
conclusionMedical glue demonstrates effectiveness in halting fluid extravasation at needle insertion sites among patients experiencing severe edema. Additionally, it reduces the duration of exudation, diminishes skin complications resulting from exudation, and significantly enhances patient satisfaction with nursing care. Given these benefits, its clinical adoption and application are highly recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39412648What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.