ArticleSurgical case reports2024
Laparoscopic repair of gastric conduit obstruction after robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a case report.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conduit size and the risk of delayed gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy.Surgery today · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric conduit obstruction (GCO) is a known complication after esophagectomy. Laparoscopic revision surgery for GCO is relatively rare, with limited reports in the literature. Here, we report a case of GCO after robot-assisted subtotal esophagectomy and posterior mediastinal gastric conduit reconstruction, which was successfully repaired laparoscopically. CASE PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old man presented with a passage disorder that became noticeable 14 months after surgery. Fluid passage was difficult, and the patient opted for revision surgery. The conduit had entered and deflected into the mediastinum; it also twisted due to band formation. The revision surgery was performed laparoscopically through five ports. The bands were dissected, esophageal hiatus was sutured, and conduit re-fixed. The intraoperative endoscopy was used to confirm that the obstruction had been released. The lack of adhesion of the posterior half of the gastric conduit wall, combined with postoperative weight loss leading to a decrease in omental volume, as well as inadequate fixation during the initial surgery, are believed to have contributed to the ease of the conduit deviation into the intrathoracic cavity. In addition, the twisting of the conduit due to band formation exacerbated the obstruction.
conclusionsLaparoscopic revision surgery may become an effective treatment option as the number of minimally invasive esophagectomies is expected to increase in the future. Furthermore, the fixation method during initial surgery should be carefully considered and optimized to prevent gastric conduit obstruction. Additionally, the use of intraoperative endoscopy to evaluate the lumen of the conduit during surgery proved beneficial in this case, highlighting its potential value in identifying and addressing obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.