ReviewArchives of dermatological research2024
Predictors of psychosocial outcomes of Mohs micrographic surgery: a review.
Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Co-Localized Dermoscopy and LC-OCT for AI-Assisted Margin Assessment of Basal Cell Carcinoma: Development of a "BCC-One-Stop-Shop" Workflow.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a highly effective treatment for skin cancers, such as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC), especially in cosmetically sensitive areas. Despite its high cure rates, the procedure's impact on psychosocial outcomes, influenced by demographic, clinical, psychological, and social factors, necessitates careful consideration. This review aims to identify and synthesize the predictors of psychosocial outcomes following MMS, thereby informing patient management strategies. A comprehensive search of the PubMed database was performed to select peer-reviewed studies in English that discuss these psychosocial aspects in MMS. The review identifies younger age, female gender, smoking, centrally located facial lesions and larger operative defects as factors associated with less favorable psychosocial outcomes. Conversely, patients with strong social support and better preoperative mental health tend to experience more favorable outcomes. This highlights the utility of integrating psychological evaluations and support mechanisms into treatment plans, promoting a patient-centered approach that considers the broader health and psychosocial needs of patients. The implications of this review are significant, suggesting that focusing on these psychosocial determinants allows healthcare providers to improve patient satisfaction and overall well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39412587What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.