ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024
Scale for the assessment of mucosal wave dynamics of the free edges during stroboscopic examination: clinical validation study and analysis of results.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Patients with Reinke's Edema Through Biomechanical Voice Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Approach to the Dynamics of the Vocal Cords During the Exploration With Flexible Laryngeal Stroboscopy.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIdentifying the mucosal wave (MW) is essential when studying the voice; however, its characterization and perceived measurement during laryngeal stroboscopy (LS) are not well defined or standardized because of the subjectivity of its interpretation. This article proposed and validated a scale that characterized and approximated MW measurement during LS, applied it to participants divided into a healthy group and groups with free edge conditions, and identified differences between them.
methodsThis is a descriptive and clinical validation study of the "VASQ (Vertical axis, Anteroposterior axis, Symmetry and Quantity) mucosal wave score" scale based on stroboscopy images of 137 adult men and women divided into a control group and functional and organic pathology groups. The images were analyzed by three evaluators according to an established protocol. Measurements dictating the reproducibility and validity criteria as well as the MW score in each group were obtained.
resultsThe reliability of the scale was α = 0.90, internal consistency success rate was 91%, intra-observer reliability was 0.83, inter-observer reliability was 0.83, content validity coefficient was 0.92, and factor loading was 0.37-0.53. The MW total score values between 5 and 6 were established as a reference for normality (P < 0.05). Organic pathology showed lower MW score values (P < 0.05), and functional pathology to a lesser extent (P > 0.05).
conclusionsThe proposed scale is a consistent, valid, and reliable tool. Its widespread application would favor commonly used terminology and facilitate quantitative comparisons in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.