ArticleJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2024
Intramammary Labeling of Epithelial Cell Division.
Article in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vitro and in vivo investigation of the capacity of mulberroside A to inhibit senescence.NPJ science of food · 2025Article
- Methods and Models in Mammary Gland Biology and Breast Cancer Research.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thymidine analogs such as ethynyl deoxyuridine (EdU) or bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) can be used to label mitosis of mammary epithelial cells (MEC) and to quantify their proliferation. However, labeling cells in larger animals requires considerable amounts of chemical that can be costly and hazardous. We developed a strategy to infuse EdU into the mammary glands of ewes to directly label mitotic MEC. First, each udder half of nulliparous ewes (n = 2) received an intramammary infusion of one of four different concentrations of EdU (0, 0.1, 1.0 or 10 mM) which was compared to BrdU IV (5 mg/kg) 24 h later. Tissues were analyzed by immunofluorescent histochemistry to detect EdU, BrdU, and total MEC. Of the EdU doses tested, 10 mM EdU yielded the greatest labeling index, while a proportion of MEC were labeled by both EdU and BrdU. We next sought to establish whether intramammary labeling could detect the induction of mitosis after exposure to exogenous estrogen and progesterone (E + P). We first infused EdU (10 mM) into the right udder half of ewes (n = 6) at t 0, followed by thymidine (100 mM) 24 h later to prevent further labeling. Three ewes were then administered E + P for 5 d, while n = 3 ewes served as controls. On d 5, EdU was infused into the left udder half of all mammary glands alongside BrdU IV (5 mg/kg). By the time of necropsy 24 h later an average MEC labeling index of 2.9% resulted from EdU delivered at t 0. In the left half of the udder on d 5, CON glands had a final EdU labeling index of 3.4% while glands exposed to E + P had a labeling index of 4.6% (p = 0.05). The corresponding degree of labeling with BrdU was 5.6% in CON glands, and 12% following E + P (p < 0.001). Our findings reveal that intramammary labeling is an efficient and cost-effective method for single- and dual-labeling of cell division in the mammary glands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.