ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
Impact of incident rheumatoid arthritis on earnings: a nationwide sibling comparison study.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incident rheumatoid arthritis and work loss: a nationwide sibling comparison study.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- The Protective Activity of Apigenin Against Bone and Cartilage Diseases.Clinical interventions in aging · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesRA is known to impact work ability, but much of this knowledge comes from historical comparisons vs the general population that neither reflects current RA management nor distinguishes between effects of RA and pre-existing socio-economic conditions of patients. We therefore aimed to examine earnings of patients before and after RA diagnosis, using recent data and sibling comparisons.
methodsSwedish register data were used including demographic information and healthcare utilization. Participants were patients with RA (aged 30-60 years, diagnosed with RA between 2006 and 2017) identified in the Swedish National Patient Register, and their same-sex siblings (n = 2433:2433; mean 48 years; 72% women). Earnings data for 2001-2019 were retrieved from Statistics Sweden and analysed from 5 years before to 5 years after RA diagnosis.
resultsNo differences in average earnings were observed between siblings during the 5 years before diagnosis, but during the 5 years after diagnosis, patients with RA earned on average 5.4% less annually [-1430€ (95% CI -2130, -720)] than same-sexed siblings. The change in earnings for the subgroup diagnosed between 2006 and 2010 was -8.2% [-2020€ (95% CI -2930, -1120)] but for patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2017, there was no statistically significant change in earnings compared with siblings [-1.5%; -420€ (95% CI -1490, 640)]. Subgroup analyses demonstrated a more negative impact on earnings for older individuals and those with lower education level.
conclusionRA diagnosis was associated with lower earnings in comparison with same-sex siblings, particularly for older individuals and those with lower education level. The negative impact of RA on earnings declined or disappeared over the study period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.