ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2024
Genome editing in ubiquitous freshwater Actinobacteria.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How sequencing technology shapes our understanding of river water microbiomes and resistomes: a comparative study.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Bringing the uncultivated microbial majority of freshwater ecosystems into culture.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Development of genome-editing tools in diverse microbial species is an important step both in understanding the roles of those microbes in different environments, and in engineering microbes for a variety of applications. Freshwater-specific clades of Actinobacteria are ubiquitous and abundant in surface freshwaters worldwide. Here, we show that IMPORTANCE: To advance bioproduction or bioremediation in large, unsupervised environmental systems such as ponds, wastewater lagoons, or groundwater systems, it will be necessary to develop diverse genetically amenable microbial model organisms. Although we already genetically modify a few key species, tools for engineering more microbial taxa, with different natural phenotypes, will enable us to genetically engineer multispecies consortia or even complex communities. Developing genetic tools for modifying freshwater bacteria is particularly important, as wastewater, production ponds or raceways, and contaminated surface water are all freshwater systems where microbial communities are already deployed to do work, and the outputs could potentially be enhanced by genetic modifications. Here, we demonstrate that common tools for genome editing can be used to inactivate specific genes in two representatives of a very widespread, environmentally relevant group of Actinobacteria. These Actinobacteria are found in almost all tested surface freshwater environments, where they co-occur with primary producers, and genome-editing tools in these species are thus a step on the way to engineering microbial consortia in freshwater environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.