Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39412291›Full record

ArticlePsychosomatic medicine

Differences in Emotion Expression, Suppression, and Cardiovascular Consequences Between Black and White Americans in the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Study.

Anna J Finley, Cassandra L Baldwin, Tia M Hebbring, Carien M van Reekum, Julian F Thayer, Richard J Davidson, Stacey M Schaefer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychosomatic medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna J FinleyFrom the Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University (Finley), Fargo, North Dakota; Institute on Aging, University of Wisconsin-Madison (Hebbring, Schaefer), Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Psychology, Georgia Southern University (Baldwin), Statesboro, Georgia; School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading (van Reekum), Reading, United Kingdom; Department of Psychological Science, University of California Irvine (Thayer), Irvine, California; and Center for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison (Davidson), Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-0881-9147
Cassandra L Baldwin
Tia M Hebbring
Carien M van Reekum
Julian F Thayer
Richard J Davidson
Stacey M Schaefer

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
U19 MIDlife in the United States-Diversity Supplement-WellsU19AG051426 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CAROL D. RYFF · 2016 to 2026
$74.8M
STATISTICS COREP01AG020166 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RYFF, CAROL D. · 2002 to 2015
$50.6M
INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
Integrative Pathways to Cognitive, Affective, and Brain HealthU01AG077928 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sterling C Johnson, MARGIE E LACHMAN · 2022 to 2026
$17.7M
Waisman Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center Down Syndrome RegistryU54HD090256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI POLLAK, SETH D · 2016 to 2020
$6.0M
Affective neuroscience of loneliness: Impacts on health and wellbeingF32MH126537 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FINLEY, ANNA JEAN · 2021 to 2023
$213k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011NIA NIH HHS P01 AG020166NIA NIH HHS U01 AG077928NIA NIH HHS U19 AG051426NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090256NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH126537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecent theoretical work suggests that the expression of emotions may differ among Black and White Americans, such that Black Americans engage more frequently in expressive suppression to regulate emotions and avoid conflict. Prior work has linked expressive suppression usage with increases in cardiovascular disease risk, suggesting that racialized differences in expressive suppression usage may be one mechanism by which racism "gets under the skin" and creates health disparities.

methodTo examine racialized differences in expressive suppression and blood pressure (a measure of cardiovascular disease risk), we used self-report and facial electromyography (fEMG) data from two cohorts of Black and White Americans from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) longitudinal study (MIDUS 2, n = 271, 34.7% Black, collected from 2004 to 2009; MIDUS Refresher 1, n = 114, 31.6% Black, collected from 2012 to 2016; total N = 385, 33.9% Black).

resultsBlack Americans reported engaging in expressive suppression more frequently than White Americans ( t (260.95) = 2.18, p = .002) and showed less corrugator fEMG activity during negative images ( t (969) = 2.38, pFDR = .026). Less corrugator activity during negative images was associated with higher systolic blood pressure only for Black Americans ( b = -4.63, t (375) = 2.67, p = .008).

conclusionOverall, results are consistent with theoretical accounts that Black Americans engage more frequently in expressive suppression, which in turn is related to higher cardiovascular risk. Additional research is needed to further test this claim, particularly in real-world contexts and self-reports of in-the-moment usage of expressive suppression.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanBlood PressureEmotional RegulationWhiteAdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesElectromyographyFacial MusclesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39412291
PMCPMC11560665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.