ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024
Seeds of language-like generativity in bird call combinations.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A bounded hierarchy framework for the evolution of syntax.Biology & philosophy · 2025Article
- Seeds of language-like generativity in bird call combinations.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Language is unbounded in its generativity, enabling the flexible combination of words into novel sentences. Critically, these constructions are intelligible to others due to our ability to derive a sentence's compositional meaning from the semantic relationships among its components. Some animals also concatenate meaningful calls into compositional-like combinations to communicate more complex information. However, these combinations are structurally highly stereotyped, suggesting a bounded system of holistically perceived signals that impedes the processing of novel variants. Using long-term data and playback experiments on pied babblers, we demonstrate that, despite production stereotypy, they can nevertheless process structurally modified and novel combinations of their calls, demonstrating a capacity for deriving meaning compositionally. Furthermore, differential responses to artificial combinations by fledglings suggest that this compositional sensitivity is acquired ontogenetically. Our findings demonstrate animal combinatorial systems can be flexible at the perceptual level and that such perceptual flexibility may represent a precursor of language-like generativity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.