ReviewCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2024
Quantitative systems toxicology modeling in pharmaceutical research and development: An industry-wide survey and selected case study examples.
Review in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- New approach methodologies (NAMs) for preclinical and translational evaluation of mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) therapeutics.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026Review
- PKRxiv: A Best Practice Model for Advancing Pharmacoequity Through Open Pharmacokinetic Data Sharing.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- A digital twin approach for transforming prescription drug labeling.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Quantitative systems toxicology approach that integrates PBPK and core hepatic metabolism: a case study with valproic acid.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Model-Informed Drug Development Applications and Opportunities in mRNA-LNP Therapeutics.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- Modernizing Preclinical Drug Development: The Role of New Approach Methodologies.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
- Leveraging In Silico and Artificial Intelligence Models to Advance Drug Disposition and Response Predictions Across the Lifespan.Clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Application of Mechanistic Mathematical Modeling to Toxicology: Quantitative Systems Toxicology (QST).Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2025Review
- Bridging academia and industry: advancing systems biology and QSP education through AstraZeneca's collaborative partnerships.Frontiers in systems biology · 2025Review
- Quantitative systems toxicology modeling in pharmaceutical research and development: An industry-wide survey and selected case study examples.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024Review
- Pharmacokinetics of Cannabinoids Delivered by Diverse Routes in Rodents.Medical cannabis and cannabinoidsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative systems toxicology (QST) models are increasingly being applied for predicting and understanding toxicity liabilities in pharmaceutical research and development. A European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)-wide survey was completed by 15 companies. The results provide insights into the current use of QST models across the industry. 73% of responding companies with more than 10,000 employees utilize QST models. The most applied QST models are for liver, cardiac electrophysiology, and bone marrow/hematology. Responders indicated particular interest in QST models for the central nervous system (CNS), kidney, lung, and skin. QST models are used to support decisions in both preclinical and clinical stages of pharmaceutical development. The survey suggests high demand for QST models and resource limitations were indicated as a common obstacle to broader use and impact. Increased investment in QST resources and training may accelerate application and impact. Case studies of QST model use in decision-making within EFPIA companies are also discussed. This article aims to (i) share industry experience and learnings from applying QST models to inform decision-making in drug discovery and development programs, and (ii) share approaches taken during QST model development and validation and compare these with recommendations for modeling best practices and frameworks proposed in the literature. Discussion of QST-specific applications in relation to these modeling frameworks is relevant in the context of the recently proposed International Council for Harmonization (ICH) M15 guideline on general principles for Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.