ArticleCurrent drug delivery2026
Local Delivery of Ginger Extract
Article in Current drug delivery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Core-Sheath Nanofibers From a Modified Coaxial Electrospinning for Transdermal Delivery of Finasteride.ChemistryOpen · 2026Article
- Multiple-Chamber Nanostructures for Drug Delivery.Current drug delivery · 2026Article
- Waterproof Fabric with Copper Ion-Loaded Multicompartmental Nanoparticle Coatings for Jellyfish Repellency.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- A Modified Triaxial Electrospinning for a High Drug Encapsulation Efficiency of Curcumin in Ethylcellulose.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- The Potential of Nano-Formulated Natural Drugs in Melanoma Treatment: A Review of Pharmacological Efficacy and Mechanistic Insights.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMetastatic melanoma poses a significant threat globally, with a distressingly low ten-year survival rate of only 10%. While FDA-approved treatments such as dacarbazine and high-dose IL-2 have been employed in clinical settings, their limitations underscore the urgent need for more effective therapies.
aimThis study aimed to develop a potential anticancer local treatment through the extraction of various amounts of ginger extract loaded into Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) nanofibers.
methodsThe anticancer activity of the produced membranes was studied on human skin melanoma B16F10 cells. Other in vitro experiments such as cell migration assay, cell proliferation assay, cell viability assay, scanning electron microscopy assay, real-time PCR assay, and ant-inflammatory assay were performed for the
resultsThe study showed that scaffolds loaded with 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 0% of ginger extract had around 784.98 ± 202.31 nm, 771.86 ± 219.07 nm, 820.65 ± 242.43 nm, 785.19 ± 203.99 nm, and 671.29 ± 184.09 nm of mean fiber size, respectively. The ginger extract-loaded membranes suppressed the growth and migration activity of human skin melanoma B16F10 cells in a dose and time-dependent manner. Real-time PCR assay showed that the developed membranes modulated the expression levels of Ras/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. Animal study results showed that our developed patches were not toxic against liver or skin tissues.
conclusionGinger extract-loaded PVA nanofibers exhibited promising anticancer potential against melanoma cells, suggesting a viable localized treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39411964What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.