Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39411877›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training2025

Changes in Y-Balance Test Scores During Months 4, 5, and 6 of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation.

Emily Campbell Srygler, Madison N Renner, Stephanie N Adler, Jennifer S Chambers, David R Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily Campbell SryglerMadison School of Education, Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Madison N RennerMadison School of Education, Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Stephanie N AdlerMadison School of Education, Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Jennifer S ChambersMadison School of Education, Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
David R BellMadison School of Education, Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is well researched since injuries typically result in lengthy recoveries and rehabilitation periods until athletes can return to full activity. Although a large body of literature on the early and late stages of rehabilitation after ACL reconstructive (ACLR) surgery exists, less is known regarding the mid-phase of ACL rehabilitation and healthy versus injured limb differences in functional testing during this stage.

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to determine if Y-Balance Test (YBT) scores obtained during the mid-phase of ACLR rehabilitation change over months 4, 5, and 6.

designCase series.

settingResearch laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsA total of 27 participants (17 females; 18.96 ± 3.02 years [range, 15-24]; 173.63 ± 10.29 cm; 72.55 ± 17.83 kg) who sustained a unilateral ACL injury, experienced no episodes of instability or knee giving away, had not suffered a previous ACL injury, and expressed a desire to return to sport at the end of rehabilitation came in once a month after ACLR to participate in a battery of tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Y-Balance Test scores in the anterior, posterolateral (PL), and posteromedial (PM) directions in the healthy and reconstructed limbs.

resultsA main effect for limb was observed for the anterior (healthy: month 4: 78.8 ± 5.8 cm, month 5: 79.5 ± 5.2 cm, and month 6: 79.4 ± 5.8 cm; reconstructed: month 4: 77.2 ± 5.9 cm, month 5: 78.5 ± 5.1 cm, and month 6: 78.1 ± 6.4 cm; P = .023) and PM (healthy: month 4: 80.0 ± 8.7 cm, month 5: 81.0 ± 9.1 cm, and month 6: 82.9 ± 8.9 cm; reconstructed: month 4: 79.3 ± 6.8 cm, month 5: 79.4 ± 8.2 cm, and month 6: 81.1 ± 8.5 cm; P = .013) directions, indicating that the reconstructed limb performed worse than the healthy limb. A main effect for time was observed for the PL direction (healthy: month 4: 74.5 ± 8.1 cm, month 5: 75.8 ± 7.4 cm, and month 6: 77.6 ± 8.2 cm; reconstructed: month 4: 74.1 ± 8.6 cm, month 5: 74.6 ± 7.7 cm, and month 6: 76.8 ± 9.8 cm; P = .023).

conclusionsThe YBT measured improvement in the PL direction across time in the reconstructed limb. In the PM and anterior directions, the YBT did not measure these same improvements across this period.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionPostural BalanceAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleReturn to SportTime FactorsYoung Adultclinical outcomesdynamic balancerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39411877
PMCPMC12057739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.