Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39411812›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2025

Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Results in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Tumors.

Brian M Slomovitz, David Cibula, Weiguo Lv, Fırat Ortaç, Sakari Hietanen, Floor Backes, Akira Kikuchi, Domenica Lorusso, Anna Dańska-Bidzińska, Vanessa Samouëlian and 20 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04634877 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Endometrial Cancer After Surgery With Curative Intent), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04634877 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Endometrial Cancer After Surgery With Curative Intent (KEYNOTE-B21 / ENGOT-en11 / GOG-3053)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2021 to 2026Enrolled990ConditionsEndometrial NeoplasmsArmsPembrolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Placebo for pembrolizumab, Docetaxel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Impact of JAK1 Pathogenic Variants and MHC-I Expression on Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Endometrial Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A radiogenomics study onBMC cancer · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Overview on biomarkers for immune oncology drugs.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Brian M SlomovitzMount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-7241-3096
David CibulaDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6387-9356
Weiguo LvDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Fırat OrtaçAnkara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Sakari HietanenTurku University Hospital, FICAN West Cancer Centre, Turku, Finland.
Floor BackesGOG Foundation, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-9225-6913
Akira KikuchiDepartment of Gynecology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Domenica LorussoFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome and Humanitas University, Rozzano (Milan), Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0981-0598
Anna Dańska-BidzińskaDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, 2nd Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Vanessa SamouëlianGynecologic Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4409-147X
Maria-Pilar Barretina-GinestaCatalan Institute of Oncology and Girona Biomedical Research Institute, Medical School University of Girona, Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0074-6614
Christof VulstekeIntegrated Cancer Center Ghent, Department of Medical Oncology, AZ Maria Middelares Ghent and Center of Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4607-5660
Chyong-Huey LaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9977-9645
Bhavana PothuriGOG Foundation, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-4578-2061
Yu ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, PR China.
Manuel Magallanes-MacielCentro Oncologico Internacional, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0002-4522-4545
Amnon AmitFaculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Valentina GuarneriDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DISCOG), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2375-8397
Flora ZagouriDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Alexandra" General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Maria BellGOG Foundation, Philadelphia, PA.
Julia WelzDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Gemma EminowiczUniversity College London Hospitals and University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Martin HrudaCentral and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group (CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7606-5164
Lyndsay J WillmottGOG Foundation, Philadelphia, PA.
Jasmine LichfieldMSD UK, London, United Kingdom.
Wei WangMSD China, Beijing, China.
Robert OrlowskiMerck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ.
Gursel AktanMerck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ.
Laurence GladieffMedical Oncology, Oncopole CLAUDIUS REGAUD, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6980-9719
Toon Van GorpBelgium and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG), Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2564-721X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer (EC) is an inflamed phenotype with poor outcomes when meeting high-risk criteria and limited treatment options in the adjuvant setting. We report protocol-prespecified subgroup analysis of patients with dMMR tumors from the phase III ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04634877) in newly diagnosed, high-risk EC after surgery with curative intent. Patients were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo (six cycles) plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (four to six cycles) once every 3 weeks, then pembrolizumab 400 mg or placebo once every 6 weeks (six cycles), respectively. MMR status was a stratification factor. Patients received radiotherapy at investigator discretion. Investigator-assessed disease-free survival (DFS) was a primary end point. No formal hypothesis testing was performed for subgroup analysis. In the intention-to-treat population, 141 patients in the pembrolizumab arm and 140 in the placebo arm had dMMR tumors. At this interim analysis, hazard ratio for DFS favored pembrolizumab (0.31 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.69]); median DFS was not reached in either group. Two-year DFS rates were 92.4% (95% CI, 84.4 to 96.4) and 80.2% (95% CI, 70.8 to 86.9), respectively. No new safety signals occurred. Longer-term follow-up of outcomes will be evaluated at final analysis. Preplanned subgroup analysis on the basis of the study's stratification factors suggests that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improves DFS and is clinically relevant for patients with dMMR tumors in the curative-intent setting.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDNA Mismatch RepairEndometrial NeoplasmsAdultAgedCarboplatinChemotherapy, AdjuvantDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPaclitaxelAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCarboplatinPaclitaxelpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID39411812
PMCPMC11771356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.