Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39411772›Full record

ReviewBioinformation2024

Ethics on academic procurement of cadavers.

Ksv Angu Bala Ganesh, Payal Panda, Tanushree Gurawa, Prarthana Kalerammana Gopalakrishna, Saravanan Jagadeesan, Thirupathirao Vishnumukkala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ksv Angu Bala GaneshDepartment of Anatomy, Gujarat Adani Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhuj, Gujarat, India.
Payal PandaDepartment of Anatomy, C.U.Shah Medical college & Hospital, Surendranagar, Gujarat, India.
Tanushree GurawaDepartment of Anatomy, C.U.Shah Medical college & Hospital, Surendranagar, Gujarat, India.
Prarthana Kalerammana GopalakrishnaPhysiology discipline, Human Biology division, School of Medicine, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Saravanan JagadeesanDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Lakeside Campus, Taylor's University, Selangor, Malaysia.
Thirupathirao VishnumukkalaAnatomy discipline, Human Biology Division, School of Medicine, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anatomy is a vital discipline in the realm of Medicine, and its primary means of study is through the use of cadavers. Experts in the medical, legal, and ethical domains have discussed the use of cadavers or their anatomical parts for educational purposes, which are considered a severe drawback. The advantages of using cadavers include their contribution to medical education, research, the investigation of innovative surgical procedures or techniques, the detection of anatomical differences at an individual or population level, the enhancement of surgical skills, and the support of other anatomical investigations. This review highlights the issues like consent, respect for the deceased and cultural beliefs on cadaver procurement practices and also it emphasizes the need for better body donation initiatives and public awareness campaigns to ensure sustainable cadaver procurement practices, ensuring consent, respect for the deceased and cultural beliefs.

Indexed as

academicsbody donationcadaversEthicalresearch

Identifiers

PMID39411772
PMCPMC11471411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.