ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Comparative clinical evaluation of the stability of implants using double acid etching treatment with and without the addition of fluoride solution: A randomized clinical trial.
Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osseointegration depends on primary stability, and further, implant surface modifications may improve secondary stability. This randomized clinical trial evaluates whether adding a fluoride solution enhances the implant stability. Materials and Methods: Stability of dental implants with two different types of surface treatments was compared utilizing resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Twelve patients were recruited: eight females and four males with an average age of 58.3 years and they received either double acid etched implants (control: Porus Implant, Sistema Conexão) and double acid etched implants containing fluoride on their surfaces (test: Porus Nano Implant, Sistema Conexão). Each patient received one implant from the test category and another implant from the control category, resulting in 24 implants in this study. RFA, utilizing Osstell was used to assess the implant stability, immediately after the placement of implant and 15, 30 and 45 days post-implant placement. Results: At the initial time, there was no difference between the test and control groups regarding the ISQ. However, after 15, 30, and 45 days, ISQ values for the test group were significantly higher than the control group. When using implants without fluoride addition, it was observed that after 15 days, the ISQ values were lower than those found at the initial time, but after 30 days, values matched the initial. Concerning the test group results, the ISQ values from T0 (immediately after implant placement) to T3 (45 days after implant placement) always increased from every period of evaluation. Conclusions: It was concluded that double acid etched implants with surfaces containing fluoride solution increases the implant stability quotient, compared to implants with fluoride-free double acid etched surfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.