Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39411716›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Challenging boundaries: is cross-protection evaluation necessary for African swine fever vaccine development? A case of oral vaccination in wild boar.

Estefanía Cadenas-Fernández, Sandra Barroso-Arévalo, Aleksandra Kosowska, Marta Díaz-Frutos, Carmina Gallardo, Antonio Rodríguez-Bertos, Jaime Bosch, Jose M Sánchez-Vizcaíno, Jose A Barasona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Estefanía Cadenas-Fernández *VISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Sandra Barroso-Arévalo *VISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Aleksandra KosowskaVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Díaz-FrutosVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Carmina GallardoEuropean Union Reference Laboratory for African Swine Fever (ASF), Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA/CSIC), Valdeolmos, Spain.
Antonio Rodríguez-BertosVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jaime BoschVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jose M Sánchez-VizcaínoVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jose A BarasonaVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) poses a significant threat to domestic pigs and wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations, with the current epidemiological situation more critical than ever. The disease has spread across five continents, causing devastating losses in the swine industry. Although extensive research efforts are ongoing to develop an effective and safe vaccine, this goal remains difficult to achieve. Among the potential vaccine candidates, live attenuated viruses (LAVs) have emerged as the most promising option due to their ability to provide strong protection against experimental challenges. However, ASF virus (ASFV) is highly diverse, with genetic and phenotypic variations across different isolates, which differ in virulence. This study highlights the limitations of a natural LAV strain (Lv17/WB/Rie1), which showed partial efficacy against a highly virulent and partially heterologous isolate (Arm07; genotype II). However, the LAV's effectiveness was incomplete when tested against a more phylogenetically distant virus (Ken06.Bus; genotype IX). These findings raise concerns about the feasibility of developing a universal vaccine for ASFV in the near future, emphasizing the urgent need to assess the protective scope of LAV candidates across different ASFV isolates to better define their limitations.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusCross ProtectionSus scrofaVaccinationVaccines, AttenuatedViral VaccinesAdministration, OralAnimalsSwineVaccine DevelopmentVaccines, AttenuatedViral VaccinesAfrican swine fevercontrol diseasecross-protectionvaccineviruswild boar

Identifiers

PMID39411716
PMCPMC11473374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.