ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2024
Self-Rated Health and its Impact on Survival of Older Adults.
Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between neighborhood socionatural environments and health satisfaction: a longitudinal mediation analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Self -rated health (SRH) is a subjective assessment of health status that results from asking a question as "How do you assess your health?". The aim of this study was to determine the value of SRH for survival of older adults. Materials and Methods: This cohort study was conducted among a population aged 60 years and over living in the north region of Iran. The participants' characteristics including demographic information, life-style behaviors, medical history, body mass index, depressive symptoms, cognitive function, and social support were examined. SRH was categorized into two groups (1. poor or fair and 2. good or excellent). All of the study population were followed up again after 5 years to determine the survival condition. Results: Totally, 1475 elderly people were included. Good or excellent SRH showed a significant association with male gender, to be married, higher physical activity, less co-morbid chronic disorders, no depressive symptoms, normal cognitive function, higher social support, smoking ( Conclusion: Considering health-related characteristics including age, gender, number of drugs the participant was taking, physical activity, BMI, and social support, SRH showed a significant effect on 5-year survival of older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.