ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2024
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Approach to Cesarean Scar Pregnancy (CSP).
Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare long-term complication after cesarean delivery. In clinical practice, its diagnosis and management is very important because it may be associated with serious consequences. Although a wide range of treatment options have been reported, the best treatment is unrecognized yet. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopy in CSP. Materials and Methods: This non-randomized single-arm clinical trial was conducted on 43 CSP patients who were referred to the educational and medical centers of Isfahan University of Medical Science from 2021 to 2022. All the patients were treated by laparoscopy, and during follow-up, the pregnancy test was measured weekly until the test was negative, and an ultrasound was performed 6 months later. Myometrial thickness and occurrence of isthmocele were checked and recorded. Abnormal uterine bleeding or pelvic pain were also evaluated 6 months later. Results: Mean time of surgery was 55.12 ± 10.61 minutes, and the rate of intraoperative bleeding was 62.93 ± 24.00 cc. Four cases had excess intraoperative bleeding: two of them received packed cells, and two led to laparotomy. After surgery, the time to negative pregnancy test was 19.21 ± 5.50 days and 4 (10.3%) patients had isthmocele in follow-up sonography. Human chorionic gonadotropin hormone (BHCG) decreased significantly after surgery (percentage reduction: 97.71 ± 3.80; Conclusion: Laparoscopic excision of a CSP is an effective and feasible technique with the advantage of an immediate myometrial reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.