ReviewTropical parasitology
Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among the pregnant women in South and South East Asian countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Tropical parasitology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Epidemiology of intestinal parasitic infections among school-aged children in low- and middle-income countries of Africa and Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence of Malaria and Soil-Transmitted Helminths and Associated Factors Among Pregnant Women Visiting Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia.Journal of parasitology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) are a major health concern in resource-limited countries of South/South-East Asian region. Despite posing a potential threat to maternal and fetal health, there is limited data available on the actual burden of IPI among pregnant women. Through this systemic review and meta-analysis, we sought to determine the pooled prevalence of IPI and species-specific prevalence among pregnant women in this region. Subgroup analysis was done by region, stool examination technique, and study settings. Among 220 retrieved studies, 21 studies from 8 countries across the region were found eligible and included in this study. The estimated overall pooled prevalence of IPIs among pregnant women was 43.15% (95% confidence interval: 30.66-56.10). The most prevalent IPI was
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.