ReviewCureus2024
The Medicine Revolution Through Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Challenges of Machine Learning Algorithms in Decision-Making.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- "First, do no harm" in the digital era: examining the practicality of the European Health Data Space proposal and ethical implications of artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review.BMC medical ethics · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning in the Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Validation of a Machine Learning-Derived Algorithm for the Measurement of Facial First Impressions.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Globalization in the Healthcare Industry: Drivers, Risks, and Adaptation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparison of human-AI agreement in ASA scoring by gender and duration of clinical experience: a real-world study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Cautionary lessons from real-world testing of GPT-4.1 AI for pediatric foreign body aspiration.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Integrated Radiology-Biochemistry Diagnostic Flow Framework for Emergency Clinical Decision Support: A Simulation-Based Educational Model.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology education: transformative applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Closed-loop neuromodulation: a paradigm shift in precision neuroscience for clinical and cognitive applications.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial intelligence in kidney transplantation: a 30-year bibliometric analysis of research trends, innovations, and future directions.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Implementation of AI in radiology: the perspective of referring physicians.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Digital Cardiovascular Twins, AI Agents, and Sensor Data: A Narrative Review from System Architecture to Proactive Heart Health.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating New Technologies in Lipidology: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Data Mining Models in Prediction of Vancomycin-IntermediateMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: A Review.Cancer informatics · 2025Review
- Psychiatry in the age of AI: transforming theory, practice, and medical education.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Descriptive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and its autonomous learning processes (or machine learning) in medicine has revolutionized the global health landscape, providing faster and more accurate diagnoses, personalization of medical treatment, and efficient management of clinical information. However, this transformation is not without ethical challenges, which require a comprehensive and responsible approach. There are many fields where AI and medicine intersect, such as health education, patient-doctor interface, data management, diagnosis, intervention, and decision-making processes. For some of these fields, there are some guidelines to regulate them. AI has numerous applications in medicine, including medical imaging analysis, diagnosis, predictive analytics for patient outcomes, drug discovery and development, virtual health assistants, and remote patient monitoring. It is also used in robotic surgery, clinical decision support systems, AI-powered chatbots for triage, administrative workflow automation, and treatment recommendations. Despite numerous applications, there are several problems related to the use of AI identified in the literature in general and in medicine in particular. These problems are data privacy and security, bias and discrimination, lack of transparency (Black Box Problem), integration with existing systems, cost and accessibility disparities, risk of overconfidence in AI, technical limitations, accountability for AI errors, algorithmic interpretability, data standardization issues, unemployment, and challenges in clinical validation. Of the various problems already identified, the most worrying are data bias, the black box phenomenon, questions about data privacy, responsibility for decision-making, security issues for the human species, and technological unemployment. There are still several ethical problems associated with the use of AI autonomous learning algorithms, namely epistemic, normative, and comprehensive ethical problems (overarching). Addressing all these issues is crucial to ensure that the use of AI in healthcare is implemented ethically and responsibly, providing benefits to populations without compromising fundamental values. Ongoing dialogue between healthcare providers and the industry, the establishment of ethical guidelines and regulations, and considering not only current ethical dilemmas but also future perspectives are fundamental points for the application of AI to medical practice. The purpose of this review is to discuss the ethical issues of AI algorithms used mainly in data management, diagnosis, intervention, and decision-making processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.