ArticleCureus2024
Microendodontics at Different Levels From Routine to Complex Cases: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past 30 years, the precision with which endodontics is performed has improved as a result of the advancements in technologies. Endodontists deal with intricate cases regularly, which appears to necessitate greater visual acuity. The invention of the dental operating microscope has been the most significant revolution. Nonetheless, due to a variety of behavioral variables, the use of magnification has yet to be adopted into general practice. The present case series aims to provide insight into the use of dental operating microscopes at different levels (routine to complex) in the field of endodontics and seeks to encourage the use of magnification in daily practice. The first level shows the non-surgical endodontic treatment of the mandibular molar with a curved canal. In the second case, the separated instrument was retrieved non-surgically using ultrasonics, whereas in the third case, surgical intervention (autotransplantation) was required for the removal of the fractured instrument. The microscope offers numerous advantages, including improved lighting, magnification, and vision of the operation field. High magnification aids in conservative access as well as identifying isthmuses, interpreting the complexity of root canal architecture, removing fractured instruments, minimizing soft and hard tissue stress, and detecting fractures and microfractures. If incorporated into daily practice, this magnifying device will drastically increase the success rate of procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.