ArticleCureus2024
Effect of Newer Intraorifice Barriers on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surface Integrity of Widely Used Resin-Modified Glass Ionomers: New Findings Amid Limited Scientific Literature.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to assess and compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using three new intraorifice barrier materials. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 60 extracted human mandibular premolars having single roots were decoronated to 14 mm length, prepared up to rotary F3 ProTaper Gold files, and sealed with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. Specimens were divided into one control and three experimental groups ( STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test were conducted.
resultsThe experimental groups showed higher mean load values than the control group. The flowable composite showed the highest mean loads followed by Biodentine and RMGIC. The mean fracture resistance of flowable nanohybrid composite and Biodentine was significantly higher than that of the control. No statistically significant difference was observed among the other groups.
conclusionThe flowable nanohybrid composite and Biodentine significantly improved resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth when compared to the control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.