ArticleCureus2024
Clinical Outcomes of Sickle Cell Disease Patients With Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) patients are predisposed to various cardiovascular complications due to the nature and progression of the disease; the clinical outcomes of SCD patients experiencing myocardial infarction (MI) and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not well known. This study aims to explore a comprehensive nationwide analysis of the clinical outcomes in SCD patients who have suffered an MI and subsequently undergone PCI. It also identifies potential complications and compares their outcomes with non-SCD counterparts with the same interventions. We conducted a retrospective analysis of SCD patients who have suffered an MI and subsequently undergone PCI using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020. The primary outcome was mortality, while the secondary outcomes were the average length of stay, comorbid conditions, and cardiovascular outcomes. Logistic, linear, and Poisson regression model analysis applied for outcomes and adjusting co-founders. P-value <0.05 was considered significant. A total of 775 patients were analyzed for MI who had PCI with SCD, with a mean age of 58±1.06 years. SCD patients exhibited higher rates of comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus (45.81% vs. 37.84%), obesity (23.87% vs. 20.85%), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (29.03% vs. 17.36%). Heart failure was more common among SCD patients with 34.19% vs. 26.02% in non-SCD patients (OR 1.5, CI 1.1-2.1, p-value=0.02). Other cardiovascular complications such as stroke, ventricular arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and mortality did not significantly differ between SCD and non-SCD (P-values >0.05). The study observed that SCD patients experienced a significantly higher incidence of heart failure than non-SCD patients. This implies that SCD patients undergoing PCI for MI exhibit distinct clinical outcomes compared to their non-SCD counterparts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.