Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39411575›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2024

Benefit finding and its influencing factors in patients with thyroid cancer: A retrospective study.

Yingjia Qian, Lei Zheng, Jian Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Association between coping strategies and benefit finding in adult cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yingjia QianSchool of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Lei ZhengDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jian LiClinical Research Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To understand the level of benefit finding in patients with thyroid cancer and identify its influencing factors. Methods: This retrospective study included 241 patients with thyroid cancer who underwent surgical treatment at a tertiary hospital in Shanghai from October to December 2022. Data were collected using the General Information Questionnaire, the Chinese Benefit Finding Scale, the Social Support Revalued Scale, and the Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore factors influencing benefit finding. Results: The total benefit finding score among patients with thyroid cancer was 89.00 (76.00, 101.50). Logistic regression analysis indicated that social support (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.14) and avoidance coping mode (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.00-1.37) significantly impacted benefit finding ( Conclusions: Patients with thyroid cancer demonstrated a high level of benefit finding. Social support and medical coping modes were identified as key factors influencing benefit finding. Healthcare professionals should focus on enhancing these aspects to improve benefit finding in patients with thyroid cancer. Trial registration: EC REFERENCE No. 2024-133.

Indexed as

Benefit findingCoping behaviorLogistic modelsRetrospective studiesSocial supportThyroid neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39411575
PMCPMC11472082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.