ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Subjective learning gain from a simulation-based health management course: a mixed methods study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- What Is the Meaning of Patient-Centered Decision-Making for a Middle Nurse Manager?-A Qualitative Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Perceived effectiveness of computer-based simulation learning in health management students: A cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Simulations are increasingly being offered as part of the educational experience of healthcare students. We used a Health Management Scenario Simulation system to create a course. This study aimed to evaluate learning gains before and after the course. Methods: Based on the learning strategies of framing, simulation, and debriefing, the Health Management Scenario Simulation course lasted 4 weeks and was conducted online. Learning gain was assessed using a comparative self-assessment questionnaire administered electronically at the beginning and end of the course. We organized focus group interviews and collected quantitative data after students completed the simulations and the questionnaire. These data were subjected to descriptive statistical analysis and thematic grouping using frequency counting. Results: There were 195 health management students enrolled in the course. In total, 265 anonymously completed questionnaires were received, 141 (72.31%) on the pre-simulation and 124 (63.59%) on the post-simulation. All questionnaire item gain values were positive, except the item "I can identify common health risk factors," which showed no change. The skills domain showed the highest learning gain, ranging from 16 to 22%. Six students participated in the focus-group study. The main themes that emerged from students' reflections were learner-centeredness, competencies, and career development. Conclusion: Students acquired health management skills through the simulation, which contributed to the development of basic attitudes and skills in their professional careers. Students' comments highlighted the value of practicing health management skills in a simulated environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.