ArticleJCPP advances2024
Attentional development is altered in toddlers with congenital heart disease.
Article in JCPP advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The imaginary divide between mental and "physical" health: Dismantling dualism and reductionism to address a monumental mistake in medicine.JCPP advances · 2026Article
- Behavioral outcomes of preschool children with congenital heart disease and controls.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Attentional development is altered in toddlers with congenital heart disease.JCPP advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) is the most common congenital abnormality. Survival rates are over 90%, however infants with CHD remain at high risk of attention and executive function impairments. These abilities are difficult to assess in toddlers because clinical assessments rely on language abilities which are commonly delayed in CHD. Our aim was to characterise visual attention in toddlers with CHD compared to controls and identify associations with parent-rated effortful control. Methods: Thirty toddlers with CHD (19 male, median (IQR) age at assessment 22.2 (22-23.1) months) and 66 controls from the developing human connectome project (36 male, age at assessment 22 (21.5-23.8) months) using eye-tracking tasks designed to assess multiple components of visual attention. Analyses of co-variance and regressions were used to identify differences between groups and relationships between gaze behaviours and parent-rated effortful control. Results: Toddlers with CHD were less accurate when switching behaviours (set-shifting) [median (IQR) 79%, (28-100)] compared to controls [100% (86-100), pFDR = 0.032], with worse accuracy associated with lower parent-rated effortful control in CHD but not controls (interaction pFDR = 0.028). Reaction times were slower during selective [CHD 1243 ms (986-1786), controls 1065 ms (0851-1397), pFDR<0.001] and exogenous attention tasks [CHD 312 ms (279-358), control 289 (249-331), (pFDR = 0.032) and endogenous attention was less mature (prolonged looks at facial stimuli CHD 670 ms (518-885), control 500 ms (250-625), (pFDR = 0.006). These results were unrelated to differences in cognition or socioeconomic status. In contrast, the allocation of attentional resources was preserved in CHD. Conclusions: We identified a profile of altered attention and early executive functioning development in CHD. Eye-tracking may provide clinically feasible, early objective measures of attention and executive function development in CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.