ArticleBioinformatics advances2024
CoNECo: a Corpus for Named Entity recognition and normalization of protein Complexes.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Despite significant progress in biomedical information extraction, there is a lack of resources for Named Entity Recognition (NER) and Named Entity Normalization (NEN) of protein-containing complexes. Current resources inadequately address the recognition of protein-containing complex names across different organisms, underscoring the crucial need for a dedicated corpus. Results: We introduce the Complex Named Entity Corpus (CoNECo), an annotated corpus for NER and NEN of complexes. CoNECo comprises 1621 documents with 2052 entities, 1976 of which are normalized to Gene Ontology. We divided the corpus into training, development, and test sets and trained both a transformer-based and dictionary-based tagger on them. Evaluation on the test set demonstrated robust performance, with F-scores of 73.7% and 61.2%, respectively. Subsequently, we applied the best taggers for comprehensive tagging of the entire openly accessible biomedical literature. Availability and implementation: All resources, including the annotated corpus, training data, and code, are available to the community through Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/11263147 and GitHub https://zenodo.org/records/10693653.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.