Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39411415›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2024

Gabapentin for Delirium in Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Eugenie Chang, Avery Parman, Peter N Johnson, Katy Stephens, Stephen Neely, Nalini Dasari, Netsanet Kassa, Jamie L Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trends in gabapentin use in a single-center neonatal intensive care unit from 2016-2024.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Correspondence on "Gabapentin for Delirium in Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit".The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eugenie ChangDepartment of Pharmacy (EC), Bethany Children's Health Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Avery ParmanDepartment of Pharmacy: Clinical and Administrative Sciences (JLM, SBN, PNJ, AP), College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Peter N JohnsonDepartment of Pharmacy: Clinical and Administrative Sciences (JLM, SBN, PNJ, AP), College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Katy StephensDepartment of Pharmacy (KS), Oklahoma Children's Hospital at OU Health, Oklahoma City, OK.
Stephen NeelyDepartment of Pharmacy: Clinical and Administrative Sciences (JLM, SBN, PNJ, AP), College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Nalini DasariDepartment of Pediatrics (ND, NK), College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Netsanet KassaDepartment of Pediatrics (ND, NK), College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Jamie L MillerDepartment of Pharmacy: Clinical and Administrative Sciences (JLM, SBN, PNJ, AP), College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA protocol was developed for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) delirium: Step 1, gabapentin for pain or melatonin for sleep; Step 2, add on other Step 1 agent; Step 3, antipsychotics. The purpose of this study was to describe the utility and dosing of gabapentin for NICU delirium.

methodsRetrospective evaluation of NICU patients from January 1, 2021-December 31, 2022 who received >1 dose of gabapentin based on the delirium protocol. Data collection included demographics, gabapentin regimen, and concomitant sedatives and analgesics. The primary objective was to identify the number of patients receiving gabapentin for Step 1 or Step 2. Secondary objectives included identifying the number of patients requiring antipsychotics (Step 3), the gabapentin regimen, comparison of Échelle de Douleur et d'Inconfort du Nouveau-né (EDIN), Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD), and Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 (WAT-1) scores 72 hours pre- and post-gabapentin initiation, and comparison of opioids, clonidine, and melatonin 24 hours pre- and 72 hours post-gabapentin initiation. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were employed with significance defined at p < 0.05.

resultsTwenty-nine patients were studied. The majority (n = 22; 75.9%) received gabapentin for Step 1; no patients required Step 3. The median initial dose was 14.4 mg/kg/day divided every 8 hours. Twelve (41.4%) required increase to a median of 16.9 mg/kg/day. A significant decrease in EDIN and WAT-1 scores was noted, but there was no change in CAPD scores or opioid, clonidine, or melatonin doses pre- versus post-gabapentin.

conclusionThe majority received gabapentin at a median dose of 14 mg/kg/day as Step 1 for delirium. Gabapentin was associated with a significant decrease in pain and withdrawal scores.

Indexed as

deliriumgabapentininfantneonatal intensive careneonate

Identifiers

PMID39411415
PMCPMC11472400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.